SON OF GEARHEAD, CAN THESE PARTS CRUISE?
By pastorgarryweaver

…and set me down in the midst of the valley which was full of Chevy parts… and lo, they were very rusty.(‘37 Chevy Service Manual)
This entry was posted on February 14, 2007 at 8:10 pm and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
February 14, 2007 at 8:47 pm
Prophesy upon these parts, Garry.
If it works, you could start selling rods and restos and fund missions with the proceeds. You might want to keep one or two, however. For sermon illustrations.
February 14, 2007 at 9:28 pm
Hey Terry,
Good to hear from you. I may be lacking in faith, but I don’t think preachin’ is gonna help these.
February 14, 2007 at 10:28 pm
That’s how all Chevys look to me.
February 14, 2007 at 10:52 pm
Thirsty,
I know you are making a snarky remark about Chevy,s, but I actually love this kind of thing. Even when they are old and rusty, they give me visions. It’s almost like having an epiphany. Sigh…
February 14, 2007 at 11:27 pm
Yes, Garry, I understand. I actually feel like we are of the same religion, but different denominations. Yours is riddled with error, of course…
February 15, 2007 at 3:10 pm
I must say I am shocked that a PASTOR would try to impose such personal interpretation on a text. Anyone that is scholarly knows that in the original language the Scripture says “Ford.”
February 15, 2007 at 8:42 pm
When I see a pile like that, something deep inside me wants to find some equally rusty but utterly foreign object, and lay it to rest there as well, so as to impose itself as being part of the original – you know, an old metal crib grating, or a rusty peice of an old washing machine, placed “just so” such that you overlook it at first, then come back to it with a vague, and finally a very particular curiousity.
Am I evil?
February 15, 2007 at 9:25 pm
Anyone that is scholarly knows that in the original language the Scripture says “Ford.”
aaaahhhh, you seem to be forgetting that the original there is in “automaic”, and therfore, correctly rendered, “general motors”…
February 16, 2007 at 10:39 am
Thirsty,
Nuh-uh!
Cameron,
I wasn’t interpreting; I was applying. Check out Even So’s comment. Now, that’s scholarly.
Daniel,
I guess it’s just a matter of perspective.I see, in this photo, a potential cruiser. You see the beginnings of a junk yard.
Even So,
You da man!
February 24, 2007 at 5:58 am
Prophesy to the mechanics of the 4 winds. I am a chevy lover too.